Evergreen Growth & Marketing - B2B LinkedIn Ads Agency
    All case studies
    🎯Professional ServicesActive

    Specialist B2B Services Firm: 4X Better Than Benchmark

    CTR of 2.35-2.74%, around 4X the usual B2B benchmark, at under £7 a click.

    LinkedIn AdsNamed Account ListsCompany Engagement Reporting
    2.35% - 2.74%
    Click-Through Rate
    ~4X typical B2B
    Versus Benchmark
    Under £7
    Cost Per Click
    Named accounts only
    Targeting

    The before and after

    Click-through rate: before

    Typical B2B LinkedIn benchmark

    After

    2.35% - 2.74%, roughly 4X

    Cost per click: before

    Volume campaigns into broad audiences

    After

    Under £7 into named accounts only

    Success measure: before

    Lead count

    After

    Engagement across whole buying committees

    The fuller story

    A small market. Only a few hundred companies could ever buy, so burning through them with volume tactics would have wasted the lot.

    We ran two things side by side: tabloid-style advertorials in the feed and InMail messages that were genuinely easy to reply to.

    The situation

    A specialist firm with a genuinely small addressable market. A few hundred companies could realistically buy, so volume tactics were pointless and expensive. The job was penetration, not lead count.

    What we did

    We uploaded a named target account list and ran only against it. No audience expansion, no lookalikes, no interest padding. Creative written for the specific problem those companies have, repeated at a frequency high enough to actually register with a buying committee.

    The result

    Click-through rate held between 2.35% and 2.74%, roughly four times the typical B2B LinkedIn benchmark, at under £7 a click into that list. Engagement spread across multiple people inside the same target accounts, which is the signal that matters when only a few hundred companies can ever buy.

    ~4X Benchmark CTRAccount penetration, not lead volume

    Why it worked

    James's read on what actually moved the numbers.

    Feed and inbox work as a pair

    The advertorials made the name familiar. By the time the InMail landed, it came from someone they had already seen. That's why the messages got answered.

    Frequency on purpose

    One ad seen once does nothing. The same message seen again and again by a buying committee is what turns a list into pipeline.

    Measure the account, not the click

    Several people engaging inside one target company is a buying committee warming up. That's what we watched.

    Who we targeted

    List

    A named target account list. A few hundred companies could realistically buy.

    Off

    No audience expansion, no lookalikes, no interest padding.

    Frequency

    High enough to register with a buying committee.

    Creative angles

    Angle 1

    Tabloid-style advertorials

    Story-led article ads in the feed, written about one specific problem these companies have.

    Why it worked: A story gets read by people who skip normal ads. Repeated, it makes the name familiar across the whole buying team.

    Do this yourself
    Your B2B Ads Are Too Boring. Steal These 4 Instead

    The POV, exposé and advertorial formats behind this campaign, broken down so you can copy the structure for your own buyers.

    Steal the 4 ad formats
    Angle 2

    Easy-to-reply InMail

    Short messages that asked one simple question, so replying took seconds.

    Why it worked: Most message ads read like a brochure. A simple question gets a reply, and a reply is a conversation.

    Example mockup: LinkedIn message ad
    F
    Founder
    Sponsored

    Hi James, honest question.

    Is [the problem] something you're dealing with this year, or is it sorted?

    Either answer is fine. One tap below.

    Yes, it's a problemSorted for nowTell me more
    Illustration of the format. Not the client's real ad or data.
    Do this yourself
    Every LinkedIn Ad Type Explained: Which Format Gets Results? (2026)

    How message ads work alongside feed ads, and how to write them so people actually reply.

    Read the message ads guide

    How the funnel worked

    1. Step 1

      Named account list only

    2. Step 2

      Problem-specific creative, repeated

    3. Step 3

      Engagement across multiple people per account

    4. Step 4

      Company engagement reporting

    What you can take from this

    1

    Penetration, not lead count

    With a few hundred buyers, volume tactics are pointless and expensive.

    2

    Watch the account, not the click

    Engagement spread across multiple people in the same target accounts.

    3

    Narrow can still be efficient

    CTR held at 2.35% to 2.74%, around 4X the typical B2B benchmark, under £7 a click.

    Run this play yourself

    Free guides, playbooks and tools covering the exact strategy and sector behind this case study.

    Want a pipeline like this?

    Tell us where your pipeline is stuck and we will tell you, straight, whether paid ads are the right fix.